Comments for hostatic.ro http://www.hostatic.ro Fri, 15 Jul 2011 11:53:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1 Comment on Using the Magic SysRq keys by Dan http://www.hostatic.ro/2011/07/13/using-the-magic-sysrq-keys/comment-page-1/#comment-6290 Dan Fri, 15 Jul 2011 11:53:56 +0000 http://www.hostatic.ro/?p=102#comment-6290 Didn't know that acronym! Very cool and makes it easy to remember! :) Didn’t know that acronym! Very cool and makes it easy to remember! :)

]]> Comment on Using the Magic SysRq keys by roentgen http://www.hostatic.ro/2011/07/13/using-the-magic-sysrq-keys/comment-page-1/#comment-6283 roentgen Thu, 14 Jul 2011 21:00:44 +0000 http://www.hostatic.ro/?p=102#comment-6283 My favourite combination: "Reboot Even If System Utterly Broken" (also referred to as "REISUB"). Taken from https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Keyboard_Shortcuts#Kernel My favourite combination:

“Reboot Even If System Utterly Broken” (also referred to as “REISUB”).

Taken from https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Keyboard_Shortcuts#Kernel

]]> Comment on Getting the umask of a running process by Dan http://www.hostatic.ro/2011/04/11/getting-the-umask-of-a-running-process/comment-page-1/#comment-4848 Dan Wed, 11 May 2011 10:37:55 +0000 http://www.hostatic.ro/?p=81#comment-4848 You are right, I apologize for that. Reading a bit more about the umask call it does set it to 0. But the thing is that when you call umask(0), the gdb prompt will output the previous umask. What you have to do after that is call umask again with the value it previously had: (gdb) call umask(0) $1 = 18 --> Now the umask is 0 but you found out that it used to have 18 (gdb) call umask(18) $2 = 0 -- > Now the umask is back to 18 / 022 I will update the post with the info, thank you for drawing attention to this! About the sleeping process, I haven't noticed anything like that, could you give more details? You are right, I apologize for that. Reading a bit more about the umask call it does set it to 0. But the thing is that when you call umask(0), the gdb prompt will output the previous umask. What you have to do after that is call umask again with the value it previously had:

(gdb) call umask(0)
$1 = 18
–> Now the umask is 0 but you found out that it used to have 18

(gdb) call umask(18)
$2 = 0
– > Now the umask is back to 18 / 022

I will update the post with the info, thank you for drawing attention to this!

About the sleeping process, I haven’t noticed anything like that, could you give more details?

]]> Comment on Getting the umask of a running process by Resu http://www.hostatic.ro/2011/04/11/getting-the-umask-of-a-running-process/comment-page-1/#comment-4846 Resu Wed, 11 May 2011 09:10:53 +0000 http://www.hostatic.ro/?p=81#comment-4846 Just tested it a little bit: call umask(0) seems to change the umask of the process to zero. And the process seems to sleep until you guit gdb. Just tested it a little bit: call umask(0) seems to change the umask of the process to zero. And the process seems to sleep until you guit gdb.

]]> Comment on Dovecot 1.2 with quotas and quota warnings by Dan http://www.hostatic.ro/2009/11/11/dovecot-1-2-with-quotas-and-quota-warnings/comment-page-1/#comment-3207 Dan Fri, 25 Feb 2011 09:02:48 +0000 http://www.hostatic.ro/?p=51#comment-3207 I really appreciate the positive feedback! Yes, it would be nice to have an LDA tutorial, I just assumed that people already had that set up and then started thinking about quotas. Anyway, I will put it on the to-do list. I really appreciate the positive feedback! Yes, it would be nice to have an LDA tutorial, I just assumed that people already had that set up and then started thinking about quotas. Anyway, I will put it on the to-do list.

]]> Comment on Dovecot 1.2 with quotas and quota warnings by Nick http://www.hostatic.ro/2009/11/11/dovecot-1-2-with-quotas-and-quota-warnings/comment-page-1/#comment-3198 Nick Thu, 24 Feb 2011 21:52:19 +0000 http://www.hostatic.ro/?p=51#comment-3198 Thanks for your great article. I believe you should add to the article that for Dovecot quotas to function correctly, one MUST set up Dovecot LDA (both in the MTA config and in Dovecot). An example setup of LDA would also be nice, although Dovecot documentation includes detailed examples for all major MTAs. Thanks for your great article. I believe you should add to the article that for Dovecot quotas to function correctly, one MUST set up Dovecot LDA (both in the MTA config and in Dovecot). An example setup of LDA would also be nice, although Dovecot documentation includes detailed examples for all major MTAs.

]]> Comment on LVM, inherit and contiguous policies by Gerald http://www.hostatic.ro/2010/02/15/lvm-inherit-and-contiguous-policies/comment-page-1/#comment-2895 Gerald Fri, 04 Feb 2011 09:49:41 +0000 http://www.hostatic.ro/?p=61#comment-2895 As marco say, just what I need. Thanks As marco say, just what I need. Thanks

]]> Comment on LVM, inherit and contiguous policies by Dan http://www.hostatic.ro/2010/02/15/lvm-inherit-and-contiguous-policies/comment-page-1/#comment-2189 Dan Mon, 27 Dec 2010 19:35:57 +0000 http://www.hostatic.ro/?p=61#comment-2189 Glad you found it useful! Glad you found it useful!

]]>